I haven’t been very active blogging this semester, because it has been so busy, but I made time to watch the debate and now I’m making time to reflect on what I saw and heard there before I listen to other analysis (which I suspect may skew my initial thoughts). I think that being aware of the issues in election season is an important part of being an informed, involved citizen, which is why I watched the debate tonight even though I’ve already decided who I’m voting for. There were a lot of things the candidates said that I disagree with, but the thing that jumped out at me the most was Mitt Romney using the phrase “disabled kids” while talking about medicare and medicaid. As a future teacher and special educator, I expect that a person in his position of power and influence would use people-first language, saying “children with disabilities” to acknowledge that children with disabilities are children first, regardless of their level of ability. From a cynical viewpoint I would expect politicians, who should be well aware of the power of language, to know about people-first language and use it out of respect and to avoid alienating an ever growing segment of the population.
Aside from that, my main criticism with the debate doesn’t have to do with anything the candidates said, but with what was never mentioned. The debate questions failed to include any questions about women’s health or workplace equality, even though the first half of the debate was entirely about economic issues and many of the talking points related to Obamacare. How is it that in a time when women are still earning 80 cents on the dollar and make up the majority of swing votes the presidential debate on domestic issues does not mention women’s issues at all? No questions and no candidate comments related to women’s healthcare or economic situation. The closest we get is discussing healthcare for senior citizens, who are mostly women, due to women’s tendency to live longer but less healthy lives than their male age-mates. It disappoints me.
Education, of course, was touched on and talk of investing and hiring 100,000 new math and science teachers was bandied about. My thing here is that more teachers won’t necessarily help make our students more successful. The best predictor of future success is not the quality of your math teacher. It’s your social and emotional intelligence; something we are not focusing on in our schools because of the push for more rigorous academic work. But that is an issue for another day. As for the investment in teachers and education; I’ll believe it all when I see it. We still have a very negative climate in this country where teachers are being vilified and criticized for all sorts of things beyond the control of any individual.
I hope that the next debate, which will be town hall style, is better. This one fell apart because the moderator wasn’t holding them to their time limits, asking real follow-ups, or calling them out when they didn’t answer the question. I also hope that women’s issues will be addressed, and I feel fairly optimistic that may happen, since there will be a female moderator for a change.